But from my perspective in Riverside, CA – HOW bizarre!! For that matter, this feels a bit like the bizarre qualities of much of the “federal reform” of the states-rights educational systems. Newark, like much of the East Coast, is funded at an incredible level compared to anything here in California or more locally in Riverside. So here are the statistics (by THEIR report to their Board – 3/29/2010):
- Enrollment: 38,400 (for 09-10)
- Budget: $800 million (10-11) plus another $140 million in “grants and entitlements” …they like us in RUSD lost about $50 million for this current year
- Per student funding: $14,658 per student
- Enrollment: 42,631 students
- Budget: $297 million (10-11) …and we reduced about $45 million in our budget this past year
- Per student funding: $4,990 per student
While I truly wish Newark and Zuckerberg all the best, it boggles my mind to think how $100 million in the Newark system will make ANY difference at this point. It also strikes me these differences are larger than Riverside and Newark – it essentially describes a difference between the East and West coast in its funding and therefore the educational opportunities that can be provided.
That is crazy! The way we are running it we could run two districts on that money and still have excess.
ReplyDeleteLove to see RUSD with an 800 million dollar budget...
The state of California is in dire financial condition. And whereas, I would love to see more money for our schools. I am unwilling to support a raise in taxes until the system reforms itself. If money alone was the solution, then students in Newark would all be excelling in large numbers. And i don't believe that to be true at this time.
ReplyDeleteHow do we compare to national averages in enrollment, budget, and per student funding?
ReplyDelete