He has indicated in multiple settings that the January proposal will not be optimistic and in fact, has suggested that we all be "sitting down" when we see it for the first time. It seems that the strategy is to provide us all with a dose of reality regarding the severity and size of the problem. So what happens after January and we head to the spring when budget-building gets serious? The common theory (in Sacramento) is that the Governor will be advocating for revenue enhancements (i.e., tax increases) to offset the horrific impacts of trying to reconcile a budget deficit of $30 Billion. The high-risk strategy is that when we see how big the problem is we will all agree (at least 2/3 of us) to increased taxing capacity -- which would "buy-back" the budget and service reductions.
As to public schools across the State of California, there are several possible impacts -- based on the apparent budget strategy:
- As we in K-12 education are about 40% of the California budget, we will take reductions like the many other departments and services throughout the state. As one very veteran and influential staff person said, "the budget you have right now, is the best you will have for the next two years." He thought we could begin to see things begin to improve in 2014.
- An attempt to move the funding of schools back to a more localized approach (rather than state) where local citizens can determine how they would like to support their local schools. This also has the impact of making more of the $30 Billion problem a local problem rather than a state problem.
How does this information reconcile with our having already passed an MOU and being told there will be no layoffs for 11-12?
ReplyDelete