Translate

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

In The News

California competed in Round II of Race To The Top (RTTT) and once again was not selected.  While there is great interest in system reform in California, we have not been competitive in this national competition.  Regardless of RTTT and federal dollars, we in California need to continue to be more aggressive in moving our system to a 21st century model that responds to the global competition.

Also this past week the Governor has encouraged local school districts to be transparent in their reporting of financial and budgetary information.  We certainly applaud the Governor's effort and have consistently been attempting to do exactly that ourselves.  While we hope that is has been obvious and there is a great deal of budget information on our District website under Budget Update and Budget Information.  More specifically, the Governor requested reporting on:
  • The amount of money going to our classroom instruction (teachers, etc.) -- which we have previously reported -- on slide #13 on page #7 on our website -- which is significantly above any state requirement.
  • Additionally, there is the actual state report (along with many others) that is available on the website for public review and information.
Certainly, our continued goal is to provide transparency and improve our communication to all concerned regarding all of our RUSD operations.

3 comments:

  1. "...21st century model that responds to the global competition." What exactly does that mean?

    Did we not qualify for the RTTT money because we won't tie our teachers to the kids test scores and classroom performance in any way?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't think it had much to do with the issue regarding tying test scores to teacher performance. We only missed the mark by 17 points, just below Ohio.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is from the Educatedguess.org blog. It states that there were three problematic areas with California's RTTT application.
    "lack of union support for the application; a troubled statewide data system that lags behind other states; and uncertainty whether the state could deliver commitments to create more effective teachers and principals."

    ReplyDelete